Like baboons our elected leaders are literally addicted to power

Submitted by gary on
Printer-friendly version

Like baboons our elected leaders are literally addicted to power Political power has a similar effect on the brain to cocaine - and it's not surprising that, as the Leveson Inquiry shows, our political leaders are hooked on it, says Dr Ian Robertson.

By Dr Ian Robertson 11:12AM BST 26 Apr 2012

Democracy, the separation of judicial powers and the free press all evolved for essentially one purpose – to reduce the chance of leaders becoming power addicts. Power changes the brain triggering increased testosterone in both men and women. Testosterone and one of its by-products called 3-androstanediol, are addictive, largely because they increase dopamine in a part of the brain’s reward system called the nucleus accumbens. Cocaine has its effects through this system also, and by hijacking our brain’s reward system, it can give short-term extreme pleasure but leads to long-term addiction, with all that that entails.

Unfettered power has almost identical effects, but in the light of yesterday’s Leveson Inquiry interchanges in London, there seems to be less chance of British government ministers becoming addicted to power. Why? Because, as it appears from the emails released by James Murdoch yesterday, they appeared to be submissive to the all-powerful Murdoch empire, hugely dependent on the support of this organization for their jobs and status, who could swing hundreds of thousands of votes for or against them.

Submissiveness and dominance have their effects on the same reward circuits of the brain as power and cocaine. Baboons low down in the dominance hierarchy have lower levels of dopamine in key brain areas, but if they get ‘promoted’ to a higher position, then dopamine rises accordingly. This makes them more aggressive and sexually active, and in humans similar changes happen when people are given power. What’s more, power also makes people smarter, because dopamine improves the functioning of the brain’s frontal lobes. Conversely, demotion in a hierarchy decreases dopamine levels, increases stress and reduces cognitive function.

But too much power - and hence too much dopamine - can disrupt normal cognition and emotion, leading to gross errors of judgment and imperviousness to risk, not to mention huge egocentricity and lack of empathy for others. The Murdoch empire and its acolytes seem to have got carried away by the power they have wielded over the British political system and the unfettered power they have had - unconstrained by any democratic constraints - has led to the quite extraordinary behaviour and arrogance that has been corporately demonstrated.

We should all be grateful that two of the three power-constraining elements of democracy - the legal system and a free press - have managed to at last reign in some of the power of the Murdoch empire. But it was a close call for both, given the threat to financial viability of the newspaper industry and to the integrity of the police system through the close links between the Murdoch empire and Scotland Yard.


Hey Marnia

Have you or Gary ever read "The Dopaminergic Mind in Human Evolution and History" by Fred H. Previc? Great book, he goes into detail about dopamine and it's effects on societies and their growth. The only problem I had with the book is that it seems to be written in a way condemning highly dopaminergic people in that they create many societal problems because of their high dopamine. Although, in a way he may have a point, considering how bad a lot of politicians and world leaders are at what they do, yet they still strive for power because of their addiction. The book reminded me a little of Unwin's "Sex and Culture." I don't know how much credence there is in either book"s theories but reading both books (most of Sex and Culture I should say, it's a huge monotonous book) definitely should help any of us addicts with low dopamine to consider how powerful it is to allow our dopamine to rise and level out. I would like to think that both books might be on to something though because, like I said, it would be nice to have as much evidence as possible as to the benefits of higher dopamine levels, not that this site and YBOP doesn't provide enough of course. :)

Nope, haven't read that

Sounds intriguing. I've always felt the key is "balanced dopamine."

In any case, solving the world's problems by poll-axing men with Internet porn is too high a price to pay for a few less rapes.

My thought is that it's time for us all to learn more about how sex affects the brain and steer intelligently - instead of settling for either extreme.

How're you doing?