Isn't there another way?

Submitted by Someone on
Printer-friendly version

I think most couples would want to have their cake and eat it too, there ought to be another way to beat the hangover. Even if you want to forgo drugs, you may be able to beat it with exercise, herbs, standing on your head, etc. Staying in love may be one way out, I once posted that if a couple doesn't live together the honeymoon may last longer and they can still stay emotionally close and have a good (maybe better) sex life, I may give it a try in my next relationship.

Isn't there another way?

We'd all like to have our cake and eat it too. Many couples do rely on
distance (being together only now and then) to cope with the hangover.
Unfortunately they lose many of the benefits of close companionship and
the sense of profound balance that comes from having a trusted companion
in their daily lives.

"Staying in love" is precisely what "Peace" recommends. The book just
helps you understand that biology doesn't want you to "stay in love,"
and that by having your cake, you set off bombs of separation, which
eventually accomplish biology's purpose of pushing you to a new mate.
Worse yet, over time, you learn a wrong message, namely that love leads
to distress and that sex is more important than relationship. It turns
out that it is sex that leads to distress, even though it feels great at
the time, and that relationships are more important for your health,
inner balance and longevity than sex is. With biology driving, we choose
sex-above-all because of the very convincing, temporary, drug-like
"highs" it produces, without seeing the high long-term costs in terms of
increasing isolation (long distance relationships being one version of
that) and mistrust of the opposite sex. The latter damage is very hard
to undo, and gets worse over time.